The presented work is devoted to a comprehensive analysis of the little-studied French-language work “Le Raskol”, published in Paris in 1859. The main tasks of the research group were the translation of the book into Russian, a comprehensive analysis of its ideological content, and an introduction to Russian historiography. The study of the book shows that the worldview of its anonymous author was a complex synthesis of conservative-protective and moderate-liberal ideas. On the one hand, the author is a consistent statesman and a supporter of the Uvarov triad, who sees Old Believers as a socio-political threat. On the other hand, he allows criticism of certain administrative imperfections, condemns absolutism, and advocates flexibility and enlightened paternalism in the field of religious policy. The researcher concludes that the book “Le Raskol” does not have great academic value as a religious study, but it is an important historical and cultural monument demonstrating the evolution of conservative ideology on the eve of Great Reforms. The essay is a valuable source for studying the history of social thought and state-church relations in Russia in the mid-19th century. The current article examines the fifth chapter of “Le Raskol”, which is devoted to a critical analysis of state policy towards the Old Believers. The author acknowledges the good intentions of the authorities, but points out the key mistake of the government of Nicholas — a superficial understanding of the nature of Old Faith. According to the author’s vision, the phenomenon of church schism was rooted in opposition to the merger of church and state. The author identifies two main causes of the conflict: religious (lack of church autonomy) and political (despotism and arbitrariness of officials). He concludes that the Old Believers will continue to remain in opposition to the state until these fundamental contradictions are resolved. Work is underway to analyze the nominations used in the book “Le Raskol” to designate various trends of Old Believers and Russian sectarianism. It is demonstrated that the choice of confessiononyms was not accidental, but reflected the specifics of the author’s worldview. The dominance of emotionally colored concepts borrowed from the nomenclature of the ruling hierarchy and the rare use of self-names of Old Believers is convincing evidence that the author viewed “folk” Christianity mainly in a negative way. In conclusion, the work provides a table of confessiononyms, systematizing the French–speaking nominations used by the author of “Le Raskol” to designate various faiths that existed in Russian society during the XIV–XIX centuries.
Keywords: Old Believers, church schism, Old Belief, Protestantism, religious tolerance, religious persecution, absolutism, Orthodoxy, confessiononyms, nominations, translation strategies.
For citation
Bytko S.S., Sayfutdinova A. The Schism. Historical and Critical essay on religious sects in Russia (chapter 5): features of the use of confessiononyms in the book “Le Raskol”. Old Believer, 2025, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 58–87. https://doi.org/10.65324/ob008